Question:
What exactly did the United States army do in the Vietnam War?
GarrettL
2009-05-17 21:24:22 UTC
What exactly did the United States army do in the Vietnam War?
Fourteen answers:
Roken
2009-05-18 00:45:11 UTC
General William Westmoreland was busy trying to make his superiors look like he had everything under control in Vietnam. The Order of Battle is a daily accounting for dead, wounded and missing VC & NVA and in general what happened today. They were referred to as the OB's. He was having his people cut the number of enemy dead and wounded in half to make it look like he had everything under control. They were recruiting more VC in the South and NVA were pouring in from the North.



Then came the Tet Offensive. If what Westmoreland was reporting was true, the Tet Offensive could not have happend. What Tet proved was that there were a hell of a lot more VC & NVA in South Viet Nam than the reports indicated.



Lyndon Johnson went on American TV and said that he would not run for or would accept the nomination for President of the U.S..



Westmoreland was replaced by Creighton B. Abrams (M1A1 Abrams),-----(and when Patton's 3rd Army reached Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge and the first tank made contact with GI's in thier foxholes, it was Abrams whose head popped out of the hatch and said hi). He was given the job of cleaning up Westmorelands mess.



CBS's 60 Minutes did a report on Westmoreland's debacle.



He sued 60 minutes. His lawyers bled him for 2 1/2 million and then told him he couldn't win.
janita
2016-05-25 05:17:44 UTC
The United States did not lose the Vietnam War. What happened is what we British call a tactical withdrawal. In any democracy, unless the people support their military forces, there comes a point when it is better to withdrawn and go home and regoup etc. Such was the case with the Vietnam war. Here in UK we were not involved in the Vietnam War in any way directly. However, it became obvious even to us die-hards, that enough is enough etc. Look at it from this historical stand point. When Lord Cornwallis surrendered his sword to General George Washington USA at Yorktown, there were still ten thousand [10,000] British Lobsters in the loyal city of New York. The British Army then in a head on with the rag-tag mob of the Continental Army would have simply ran through the lot of them and on to wherever without any problem what so ever. But that's not the way of it. Let's get out and keep at least a semblance of a decent image. My advice is for the Americans to wipe it from their minds and move on.
2009-05-17 21:48:41 UTC
Lots of things; understand that it still stands as the longest war in United States history. The Army played a large role, but so did the other branches as well.



Over the course of our involvement, we dropped three times the number of bombs that were used in WWII. Among these bombs, some contained napalm, a type of gel which creates a fire that can't be put out with water or other conventional means.



We also sprayed various herbicides and defoliants, the most well-known of which was Agent Orange. The companies which created these chemicals, purported that it wasn't harmful to humans. Basically, these chemicals ate away plants, which the NVA and Vietcong used for cover (being that Vietnam is mostly jungle). It turned out afterwords that the chemicals used were known to be harmful to people, but our government authorized its use anyways. It killed and sickened many Vietnam Veterans following the war as a result. It also causes around 30,000 Vietnamese birth defects every year (physical anomalies, psychological disorders, etc.).



All in all, we killed millions of Vietnamese; including NVA, Vietcong and civilians. We lost over 58,200 troops during the war, and over 100,000 Vietnam Veterans have committed suicide since its conclusion in 1975. These are just the facts, this war was brutal for all parties involved.
2009-05-17 21:36:01 UTC
I'm guessing you're one of those people that believe what others have told about the US Military losing the Vietnam War.



Myth: The United States lost the war in Vietnam.

Fact: The American military was not defeated in Vietnam. The American military did not lose a battle of any consequence. From a military standpoint, it was almost an unprecedented performance. General Westmoreland quoting Douglas Pike, a professor at the University of California, Berkley a major military defeat for the VC and NVA.



THE UNITED STATES DID NOT LOSE THE WAR IN VIETNAM, THE SOUTH VIETNAMESE DID . Read on........

The fall of Saigon happened 30 April 1975, two years AFTER the American military left Vietnam. The last American troops departed in their entirety 29 March 1973. (Here is a little know fact. The Intelligence gathering mission in Southeast Asia continued until February 1976)





United States in Vietnam 1945-1975

Comprehensive Timelines with Quotes and Analysis

VIETNAM WAR FACTS VS FICTION
2009-05-19 16:15:45 UTC
Bomb innocent civilian targets while supporting South Vietnam, which was a dictatorship not different from communism. We lost 58,217 men fighting the war against a nation we could not defeat, the USSR, which was the true victor of the war. However, America did win statistically.
Hawgdog
2009-05-21 11:30:24 UTC
The US Army did fight and die to stop the spread of Communist aggression in south east Asia. Be it known We did not lose the war we just not allowed to cross the borders to finish them off.







to those who gave the ultimate sacrifice: May we the people never forget those who die to defend our way of life.
Doggzilla
2009-05-20 19:21:49 UTC
The US became involved in the war after the most powerful leader in Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh, took support from the communists.

Ho Chi Minh had previously defeated the French after they tried to force a government on the people of both North and South Vietnam.

After the French were defeated, the country was given an election to determine if they would be a democracy or communist and the communists won. The US would not allow another nation to fall under control of communism and so, after considerable political pressure, Vietnam was divided in two.

In the early 60s, North Vietnamese operatives began to raid the south and it became increasingly difficult for the Vietnamese to hold them off. The US created the Green Berets in order to train the locals how to defend themselves, but it still was not enough.

In 1965, President Johnson (the man who replaced JFK after he was assassinated) sent a considerable force of troops to south Vietnam in order to protect them.

Even with US forces in Vietnam, the Communists were almost completely free to do what they like in the North, and so an increasingly large US force was required. Eventually over 600,000 US troops were stationed in Vietnam at any one time.

The US placed restrictions on their own bombers in order to try and wear down the north without actually taking over the country.

The US dropped far more bombs than were dropped in all of WWII, but because there were massive areas of North Vietnam that were off limits, it was ineffective.

In the late 60s there were several massive offensives by the North, such as the "tet" offensive. The North threw men at the South in huge numbers and the US repelled and killed tens of thousands of enemy troops.

In military terms the US was extremely sucessful, losing "only" 58,000 for the 1.8 million+ North Vietnamese which were killed.

In political terms, the US lost, simply because its military came across as a bully who was killing everything in site.

The media was a significant factor in the political loss of the Vietnam war, since it has been proven that a good deal of reports by all sources were false or biased.

For instance, there is a picture which enraged the US, a picture of a South Vietnamese police chief executing a North Vietnamese insurgent. The picture was taken the instant the gun went off.

The media made it seem that our allies were just ging around blowing people's heads off, but the truth was completely different.

The insurgent who was executed had just murdered an entire family, and even to this day the cameraman stands up for the police chief and is even friends with him.

It was things like this which made a waste of the 58000 US lives and hundreds of thousands of limbs lost in Vietnam.

Towards the end of the war, the US forces under the command of President Nixon made huge strives toward crippling the north. Massive bombing campaigns like operation rolling thunder II leveled every major North Vietnamese military installation on the surface.

In the early to mid 70s, the US and the North began peace talks. The US had almost completely crippled the North as of 1973, and so in 1974 a peace treaty was signed.

The North was reduced to about 1/5th of its strength, and the South was left with a huge modern military funded by the US, but after the US pullout, the South's economy collapsed and it could not longer support its military.

In 1975, the South collapsed, and the North rolled in with a relatively small military compared to what it previously had. The South's military ran, and was trapped in the congestion caused by fleeing civilians.

The Northern Army surrounded the Southern Army at a bottleneck in a major road and killed over 250,000 soldiers and Civilians.

From there on the North was almost free to do whatever it liked.

Eventually it took all of South Vietnam, and they became modern Vietnam.
haskinsmd
2009-05-19 10:20:17 UTC
First off , I was there and damm proud of my service SGT us army. the year i served ,more bombs were dropped than all of WWII we lost only a little over 40,000 to the enemy the remainder were accidents and illness, over 3 million of our enemy were killed 58,329americans were lost in total ..we did one hell of a outstanding job. the hippies and the drug induced students that protested something they knew not,and werent there are the ones who lost the war ... and that is a fact ....
thesurfer
2009-05-18 08:19:57 UTC
Hello there

I am the surfer



I agree with all others before me yet i could have some other thing to say

The US self led to believe that technology an money alone could win battles and that is no the case, the vietnam jungle posed many obstacles, jeeps and tanks could not take the lead to wage combat like gulf war, korea, or ww2 , look also somalia, in absence of the tech factor us infantry alone could not prevail , or modern day iraq , the us military got nuclear submarines, advanced planes like the f 22, satellites and the like and are way far from total annihilation of the Iraqi insurgency



From the surfer
?
2009-05-17 21:48:23 UTC
Tried to contain the spread of communism. We said we won that but we really didn't because if you look after Vietnam war communism in vietnam existed
mnbvcxz52773
2009-05-17 21:37:05 UTC
The Armed Forces were stopping the communists from expanding south. The NVA and VC were getting decimated in the battlefield, but the US and allies were prevented from finishing them off because we couldn't cross the borders.



We did not lose a war of attrition, we were winning that, what we lost was a battle of wills due to changing public opinion in the US. The NVA and VC outlasted US public will, not attrition.
Stand-up philosopher. It's good to be the King
2009-05-17 21:50:49 UTC
What the French could not do.....win battles!



Just left the former Dai, now Helen. Got her to give into watching the submarine races in her living room...woo hoo. Her generation of Vietnamese lived thru the whole thing. they are amazed at the crap our press fed us. They did not know this until they had to flee here...but they now understand what caused us to leave.



It's still Saigon, most are Reagan Republicans, they will spit on or attack those with an accent from N. Viet Nam, praise Uncle Ho in their presence at your own risk, they HATE John Kerry for being a sack of $h!t!.



The 3 links will dispell many myths..BUT only if you read them!
Lionel Frankenstein
2009-05-17 21:32:07 UTC
Supported the South Vietnamese government and lost a war of attrition versus an enemy that was difficult to identify.
2009-05-17 21:29:16 UTC
Tried to stop Communist expansion. Our drugged-out hippies stopped us and then proceeded to indoctrinate Americans with Communist psychological subversion. And now we have Obama.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...