Question:
Why do you think it is that Italian soldiers fought so poorrly in WW2?
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Why do you think it is that Italian soldiers fought so poorrly in WW2?
Eighteen answers:
oscarsix5
2008-04-28 06:11:07 UTC
The average Italian soldier whenever he was properly lead and supported fought well and courageously in World War II. The problem existed chiefly among the officer class of the Italian Army where the vast majority of commissioned were either out right brought or political favors. As a result a great deal of the Italian leadership was unqualified for the positions they held in the field. There are many incidents where Italian troops came under German leadership, especially on the Eastern Front and fought like devils under the direction of German Sergeants.
Jingwa
2008-04-27 23:12:04 UTC
Russians didnt always fight hard, in some cases they put up next to no fight at all and it was due to morale, leadership, confusion, training etc etc. When they did fight hard they had better morale, better leadership and they had a reason to fight.



When they tried to take over Finland they failed, They often were defeated by a handful of men. Were other times when the russians had their game together it resulted in some very bloody battles.



This same scenario happened with germany, germany had better trained men and better equipment and also the Fins assisted the germans in Russia, it was only till the Russians got their heads screwed on near the end they started to fight hard, but nature was on their side and also the hitlers stupidity as he enjoyed ignoring advice from his military commanders.



The Russians would have lost if hitler listened to his military adviser more during the war.



Italy was in the firing line for the war and shared many of the above issues also, i cant answer the question though since i have done no research on italy...there are to many untalled stories overshadowed by the US, Russia and other major allies during the time.



Although germans were very well trained and very well equiped, they also had very good military leaders, but unfortunately hitler was to focused on what he wanted and the people were also starting to see his insanity and loosing morale.
Botsakis G
2008-04-28 03:29:37 UTC
You have to read the history of Italy during WW2 to know the reasons behind, instead on relying on some people's opinions that are mostly biased.



Mussolini was a dictator who seized power in a coup that overthrew the legitimate and democratic Italian government long before WW2. So It was obvious that ordinary Italians never liked him. Most Italians were against Mussolini's decision in signing the Tri-Partite Pact, the treaty that formed the Axis Alliance between Germany, Italy and Japan. But with a dictatorship in power, the voice of the people means so little. Had a referendum been held at the time, the vast majority of Italians would surely had voted against Italy's joining the Axis. But there was no such referendum in a dictatorship.



It was Mussolini's commitment to the Axis Alliance that dragged Italy into the war. There was a provision in the Tri-Partite Pact wherein it was stated that in the event any one of the three Axis members would be at war with any other nation, the other two would simultaneously declare war in support of their ally.



Everybody knows that Britain and France declared war on Germany as a result of Germany's invasion of Poland (that triggered WW2). Therefore, this automatically puts Italy as a de-facto participant in the war (in support of Germany as required by the treaty) even though Italy never had any interest of its own on Poland. Later on, Italy would again be dragged in exactly the same way to fight against Russia (as a result of Germany's invasion of Russia).



It is very clear that Italy's participation in the war was not because of its own initiative but was mainly due to the commitment made by Mussolini to support Germany in the war.



This was the reason why the Italian Army fought half-heartedly during WW2. Most Italian soldiers felt that they are fighting for Germany rather than fighting for Italy. Furthermore, Italy would have to face war against Britain, France, Russia, and later on America (nations that in reality never actually posed any threat or adversity towards the Italian nation during its past histories).



It is to be noted that in the latter part of WW2, Mussolini was deposed from power during an uprising. With Mussolini out, General Badoglio, the newly installed commander of the Italian Army then immediately arranged for Italy's surrender to the Western Allies. Soon after the surrender, Italy declared war against Germany. Then in the closing days of WW2, Mussolini and his mistress were executed by Italian partisans and their dead bodies hung upside down in a public square.
ripperbravo6
2008-04-28 07:07:44 UTC
Poor leadership. Italy actually had one of the most innovative and well trained militaries of Pre-war Europe, including things like Airborne troops and Special Forces (commandos), however, due to Mussolini injecting political leadership into the military, the troops were often poorly led, and they became not much more than cannon fodder to be used and abused by the better led Germans.
2008-04-27 22:56:32 UTC
The people were deeply devided politically. While the fascists took Italy to war that move was bitterly opposed by many, such as the communists and socialists. They wouldn't want to kill or be killed for a regime they hated.

It's nonsense to talk of any people or country being 'cowardly'. Remember, there was once an empire based in Italy that ruled over most of the known world by force of arms.
clovernut
2008-04-27 23:27:51 UTC
Most of them thought that their government had sold them down the river in the governments support of fascism. Others were communists whose only interest was to get the war over as soon as possible, win or lose, so that they could have a revolution to seize control.

Fortunately the middle political mainstream of today has achieved democracy for several decades and they are quite rightly once again a proud Nation.
jadoo
2016-10-12 11:17:28 UTC
1000's of British commonwealth troops fought from 1939 on. there have been British troops who fought in France and have been evacuated from Dunkirik in 1940 who took area interior the 1944 Normandy invasion and went directly to combat until 1945. Frankly all and sundry whose first action became Normandy had already neglected rather some the conflict.
2008-04-27 23:01:04 UTC
Perhaps it was because they lived in a dictatorship where the funds to train them properly were not available until the country was actually in the war. It is not like Germany, who knew it was going to war and had time to build up their arsenals and work on their infrastructure. I think it was merely financial, lack of money for training.
Bobby
2008-04-27 22:26:06 UTC
You have it right when you say that they did not really believe in the war. Why should they be fighting for Germany? The German soldiers were fighting partly to prevent the destruction of their country and their families. They were probably more disciplined too, though.
2008-04-28 20:31:48 UTC
It is quite likely that it was about training and direction. A lot of the commanders werent that experienced, and many men therefore died unneccissarily in battle. The best soldier is only as good as the worst commander. Many men, from all countries, didnt believe in what they were fighting for, so I doubt that they didnt do so well becuase of that.



Or perhaps the quality of food dropped when they got into battle?
trasosmontes
2008-04-27 23:02:02 UTC
I agree in the main with 'RayN-here'.



Incidentally, the man who taught me everything during my apprenticeship, was a soldier in the British 8th. Army and saw action in Nth. Africa and Italy. It was his opinion that Italian Alpino troops were every bit as hard and tough as the German SS.

Not every Allied soldier was a 'hero' either, according to some old soldiers I've spoken to over the years anyway.



To me, it gets back to RayN-here's answer.
2008-04-27 22:29:47 UTC
Of all the people in the E U the only ones I care for are the Italians Sure they don't care for Mr Bush and some of the things my country does and they well tell you so But it's not with that smug all knowing hateful tone I just think they are easy going people and love life and people
Zabanya
2008-04-27 22:28:07 UTC
That's because their equipment were of poor quality. They usually made their equipment by themselves. They also had poor logistics.
2008-04-27 23:08:23 UTC
poor motivation to fight. getting beaten by ethiopia wouldnt raise anyone's spirit.
2008-04-27 23:40:06 UTC
Italians are great lovers not soldiers. Are you aware that the Italian tanks had one forward gear and three in reverse? Each Italian soldier carried a card written in three languages saying: Don't shoot. I surrender.
?
2008-04-27 22:31:42 UTC
Bobby has got it in one, well constructed answer, Bobby.
2008-04-27 23:05:31 UTC
would you honestly fight for a country like italy
Bob
2008-04-27 22:22:40 UTC
Cowardice as a people and a country.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...