Ok during world war two the United States had two basic fronts One in Europe and the other in Pacific. My question is why did we only divert the marines to the Pacific and not split them like we did with the Army. I understand the Marines are a lot smaller than the Army and cant take the beating like the Army can. Nor do they have the resources to fight for a sustained period. I know this cause I am a soldier and I have worked with Marines before. But this is what I wonder why not split them? I believe there were 6 marine divisions during the war witch is nothing compared to the Armys sum 100 during the war. Now I heard that the island campaign suited them better because they got to do their bread and butter witch was beach taking but their were at least 4 or 5 of those in the European theater witch the Army conducted. The other thing ive heard is that during the European campaign that divisions were out at the front for 30-60 days and that the Marines could not meet this demand but at Iwo Jima and Okinawa the Marines fought for just as long as that requirement. Please help and thanks.
Also the Marines were not at Normandy that would be Soldiers and Coast Guardsmen