American Dreamer
2007-11-16 18:35:35 UTC
The key to the problem is understanding why the Russians supply the Iranians with uranium.
The reason:
It is leverage against the US insistence on installing interceptor missiles in Poland (and the radar in Czech Republic), which nullify the Russia's nuclear deterrent, (because although 10 missiles will not stop a Russian nuclear response, it is the beginning of installing a limitless number of interceptor missiles)…Kremlin also argues that it is a violation of the ABM treaty signed under President Nixon.
Our logic:
We install interceptor missiles so that we can shoot down any future nuclear missile from Iran that may threaten the West". Which, BTW, Russia does NOT believe.
Question:
If we DON'T install interceptor missiles in Europe, the Russians won't have the reason to supply Iran with uranium (Kremlin has made this clear that this is what is motivating them), if Iran has no uranium then they don't have a nuclear bomb with which to threaten anyone.
Therefore it seems that the "rationale" for installing the interceptor missiles is a “self fulfilling prophesy”,
* * * * *
Remember, President Bush very much wanted this interceptor missile system in the beginning of his first term (early in 2001), before Iran’s nuclear program was any kind of priority (9/11 momentarily changed his priorities, however).
Therefore do you think President Bush is actually creating the problems & justification for the interceptor system, or is agenda legitimate?? (If you say it is legitimate, give your logic instead of just talking out your azz)
Is the contractor for the interceptor missiles a Bush campaign contributor?